HOW CR OCCURS?

What remains to be explained, once the stimulus–stimulus association theory has been accepted, is why the CR should occur and why it should take the form that it does. Pavlov’s dogs might ‘know’, by virtue of the CS–US link, that light and food go together, but this does not necessarily mean that the animal should start to salivate in response to the light. The most obvious explanation is that activation of the US (food) centre will evoke a given response, whether that activation is produced by presentation of the US (food) itself or, via the learned CS–US (light–food) connection, by presentation of the CS (light). An implication of this interpretation is that the CR and the UR should be the same, and this is true for the case just considered: the dog salivates (as a UR) to food and also comes to salivate (as a CR) to the light that has signalled food. In other examples of conditioning, however, the CR and UR are found to differ. In the autoshaping procedure, for instance, the UR is to approach and peck insid the food tray, whereas the CR that develops with training is to approach and peck at the light. In this case, the CR appears to be a blend of the behaviour that activation of the US (food) centre tends to evoke and the behaviour evoked by the CS (the light) itself. So we cannot say that the CR and the UR are always the same. There is, however, a simple rule that describes the relationship between them for most cases of conditioning, in that, as a result of classical conditioning, the animal generally comes to behave toward the CS (the light in these examples) as if it were the US (food). In other words, the CS (light) appears to take on some of the properties of the US (food) and to serve as an adequate substitute for it. So the unconditional response of a hungry animal is to approach food, probably salivating as it does so, and then to consume the food (by pecking, if the animal is a pigeon). The CR consists of directing these behaviour patterns toward the CS, in so far as the physical properties of the event used as the CS will allow this. This rule is sometimes referred to as the stimulus substitution hyphothesis. [stimulus substitution when the conditioned stimulus comes to acquire the same response-eliciting properties as the unconditioned stimulus]