Cognitive approach to language acquisition
The Cognitive Approach in psychology is a relatively modern
approach to human behaviour that focuses on how we think, with the belief that
such thought processes affect the way in which we behave.
The
term cognitive psychology came into use with the publication of the book Cognitive
Psychology by Ulric
Neisser in 1967.
Cognitive Psychology revolves around the notion that if we want to
know what makes people tick then we need to understand the internal processes
of their mind.
Cognition literally means “knowing”. In other words, psychologists
from this approach study cognition which is ‘the mental act or process by which
knowledge is acquired.’
Language Acquisition
Language is a cognition that truly makes us human. Whereas
other species do communicate with an innate ability to produce a limited number
of meaningful vocalizations (e.g. bonobos), or even with partially learned
systems (e.g. bird songs), there is no other species known to date that can
express infinite ideas (sentences) with a limited set of symbols (speech sounds
and words).
This ability is remarkable in itself. What makes it even
more remarkable is that researchers are finding evidence for mastery of this
complex skill in increasingly younger children.
Early Theories
One of the earliest scientific explanations of language
acquisition was provided by Skinner (1957). As one of the pioneers of
behaviorism, he accounted for language development by means of environmental
influence.
Skinner argued that children learn language based on
behaviorist reinforcement principles by associating words with meanings.
Correct utterances are positively reinforced when the child realizes the
communicative value of words and phrases. For example, when the child says
‘milk’ and the mother will smile and give her some as a result, the child will
find this outcome rewarding, enhancing the child's language development
Universal Grammar
However, Skinner's account was soon heavily criticized by
Noam Chomsky, the world's most famous linguist to date. In the spirit of
cognitive revolution in the 1950's, Chomsky argued that children will never
acquire the tools needed for processing an infinite number of sentences if the
language acquisition mechanism was dependent on language input alone.
Consequently, he proposed the theory of Universal Grammar:
an idea of innate, biological grammatical categories, such as a noun category
and a verb category that facilitate the entire language development in children
and overall language processing in adults.
For example, according to the Universal Grammar account,
children instinctively know how to combine a noun (e.g. a boy) and a verb (to
eat) into a meaningful, correct phrase (A boy eats).
This Chomskian (1965) approach to language acquisition has
inspired hundreds of scholars to investigate the nature of these assumed
grammatical categories and the research is still ongoing.
Contemporary Research
A decade or two later some psycho linguists began to
question the existence of Universal Grammar. They argued that categories like
noun and verb are biologically, evolutionarily and psychologically implausible
and that the field called for an account that can explain for the acquisition
process without innate categories.
Researchers started to suggest that instead of having a
language-specific mechanism for language processing, children might utilise
general cognitive and learning principles.
An example of this gradual pattern learning is morphology acquisition. Morphemes are
the smallest grammatical markers, or units, in language that alter words.
Approaching language acquisition from the perspective of
general cognitive processing is an economical account of how children can learn
their first language without an excessive biolinguistic mechanism.
Bilingualism
n Multilinguals
> Monolinguals
n Individual
Bilingualism – the use of two (or more) languages by an individual
n Societal
Bilingualism – the use of two (or more) languages within a given community
n E.g.,
the bilingual setting in India, Canada, Switzerland, Malaysia, etc.
n The
term ‘bilingualism’ may mean different things to different people.
n To
the average person, bilingualism can be loosely defined as:
n the
use of two languages or the native-like control of two languages.
n Bilingualism
has often been defined in terms of language competence. But a definition of bilingualism must also
account for the impact of social, psychological and cultural variables on the
bilingual individual.
n Five
important variables in relation to bilingualism:
1] degree of bilingualism
2] context of bilingual language acquisition
3] age of acquisition
4] domain of use of each language
5] social orientation
There are two
major patterns in bilingual language acquisition:
n Simultaneous Bilingualism
n Sequential Bilingualism.
In simultaneous
bilingualism,the child acquires two languages at the same time before the
age of 3 years
n In the first stage they may mix words or
parts of words from both languages in the first stage.
e.g.
I like dondurma
Stage 2 occurs at
4 years and older when distinction between the two languages takes place ,and
the child uses each language seperately
e.g. I like ice-cream.
Dondurmayı seviyorum.
Sequential
bilingualism also occurs
before the child is 3 years old, but the child can draw on the knowledge and
experience of the first language while acquiring the second language
Bilingual Studies
•
Additive bilinguals
–
Learn a second language without loss to the native
language
•
Subtractive bilinguals
–
Learn a second language that interferes with the native
language
•
Simultaneous bilingual
–
Learn two languages from birth
•
Sequential bilinguals
–
First learn one language and then another
Factors Influencing Bilingualism Fluency
–
The earlier in life a second language is learned, the
more fluent the speaker will become
–
Bahrick & colleagues disagree
•
Vocabulary and fluency is acquired just as well in
older participants but not fluency
–
Research showing advantages
–
enhanced executive functions
–
delayed onset of dementia
–
acquire more expertise in their own language
–
sensitive to subtle aspects of language
–
perform better on tests of nonverbal intelligence that
require recognition of verbal patterns
–
Research showing disadvantages
–
have smaller vocabularies
–
access to lexical items in memory is slower
Single-System or
Dual?
•
Single-system hypothesis
–
Two languages are represented in one system
•
Dual system hypothesis
–
Two languages are represented by separate systems
Language
Mixtures and Change
Bilingualism is not a certain outcome of linguistic contact
between different language groups. Here are some scenarios of what can happen
when different language groups come into contact with each other:
•
Sometimes when people of two different language groups are in
prolonged contact
with
one another, the language users of the two groups begin to share some
vocabulary that is superimposed onto each group’s
language use. This superimposition results in what is known as a pidgin.
It is a language that has no native speakers (Wang, 2009).
•
Over time, this admixture can develop into a distinct linguistic
form. It has its own grammar and hence becomes a creole.
An example of a creole is the Haitian Creole language, spoken in Haiti. The
Haitian Creole language is a combination of French and a number of West African
languages.
•
Modern creoles may resemble an evolutionarily early form of
language, termed protolanguage (Bickerton,
1990).
Pidgins &
Creoles
•
Pidgins
–
Communication between two language groups
–
Often used between immigrants and locals or
missionaries and natives in order to be understood by each other without having
to learn the language of the other group
•
Pidgin develops over time in such a way that it becomes
a Creole
•
Creoles
are complete languages, Pidgins are not
–
Does
have native speakers
–
Has
developed through expansion form and grammar
–
Is
stable and autonomous in its norms
Dialects
A regional variety of
a language distinguished by features such as vocabulary, syntax, and
pronunciation
No comments:
Post a Comment